Taking into account the afore-mentioned the aim of the paper is to analyse quality of higher education programmes in economics in Latvia.
The paper both concentrates on theoretical analysis and on analysis of statistical data gained in frames of the European Social Fund financed project “Evaluation of higher education programmes and proposals for quality improvement”, No. 2011/0012/1DP/1.1.2.2.1/11/IPIA/VIAA/001, being implemented from May 2011 – April 2013.
There are several research papers devoted to measuring quality in education (Benett, 2011, Bornmann, et.al, 2006, Crozier, 2010, Darussalam, 2010, Daunoriene, 2011, Filippakou, 2011, Kai, 2009, Kettunen, 2011, Sarrico, et.al, 2010, Smith, 2008, Westerheijden, et.al, 2007, etc.) and they often conclude the issue of measuring quality is comparatively complicated, since based on a number of factors, inter alia subjective ones.
Besides, a tension between productivity and quality becomes evident in many debates in higher education, however there is often an insufficient link between the two aspects (Sariko, et.al., 2010). To this day, there is still no widely acknowledged concept regarding the definition of higher education quality (Kai, 2009).
The paper provides suggestions for the most important factors to be taken into account when evaluating education quality in economics. The paper concludes that in general the quality of economic programmes in Latvia is high and corresponds to the overall accepted criteria, however, there are certain improvements necessary to be implemented. Besides, regardless to the high number of unemployed persons with economic degree, the unemployment level among recent university graduates of economics is comparatively low.