The competitiveness dynamics in the eurozone
Background: The frequency and nature of shocks impacting the individual countries is the one of major factors determining the success of a monetary union. Starting with the seminal work of Robert Mundell (1961), economic writers analyzed varying roles symmetric and asymmetric shocks played in the optimality and a success of currency unions both theoretically and practically.
However, it is equally important for the success of a monetary union to analyze the longer term trends. This is especially so in the organization like EMU (Eurozone), where the monetary centralization operates in the environment of decentralized fiscal structures, limited fiscal transfers between the participating entities (independent states) and very limited labor mobility.
In such an environment, the diverging trends between the participating entities (states) are unlikely to be compensated for by an induced factor movements and/or structural changes (not to mention fiscal transfers etc.), as happens in the similar dynamics within the centralized political entities (individual states).
Political response to the diverging trends (if such trends can be identified) is difficult to predict. On the extreme poles two responses are possible. On the one side radical structural reforms can be attempted to obtain the convergence processes, perhaps accompanied by an increase of both interstate fiscal transfers and (to a degree) political centralization in the decision making processes of EMU. On the other side the EMU in its current form can disintegrate. But, indeed, many “in between” results are certainly imaginable.
Method and Data: This paper endeavors to investigate the dynamics of the competitiveness in the Eurozone and its interplay with fiscal and financial variables. The relevant data are obtained from the Eurostat and ECB.
Expected Results: We expect to find that in the first 11 years of its existence the significant and rising divergences developed in the area most important for the long run economic performances of both Eurozone as a whole and individual countries – the competitiveness – if we evaluate the dynamic real exchange rate performance (the most commonly used competitiveness measure) for the 12 original Eurozone countries. That conclusion is expected to hold as well for the dynamics of current accounts and fiscal positions. As recent developments demonstrated, unless addressed, this divergence trend may constitute a significant, and perhaps the ultimate, threat to the Eurozone cohesion and perhaps to its existence.