How much is a lottery worth? An analysis in view of lottery privatizations in Greece
Optimal lottery pricing given a usual lottery demand equation, requires setting the payout ratio at a price elasticity of demand equal to one, assuming that the operator has zero marginal cost. In fact a large number of empirical papers around the world indicate that operators abide by the inverse elasticity rule (Perez and Humphreys, 2012; Grote and Matheson, 2011). Since state lotteries are an important source of non-tax revenue, optimal pricing is a significant factor in providing fiscal slack to the authorities, especially in times of crisis. However, when a single operator sells multiple lotteries or when he introduces new game variants after some time, as it is almost always the case, optimal pricing principles should account for interdependence and/or cannibalization effects.
The objective of this study is to assess the rationality of game pricing and innovation decisions of the Greek lottery operator up to its final privatization as a step towards finding out whether the firm has been over- or undervalued at the time the deal was struck. To this we estimate cross and price elasticities on data from a sample of two lottery games operated in Greece and we assess pricing decisions and assess innovations on the basis of a multiproduct model (Forbes, 1988).