The impact of environmental regulation on output -- gross versus net impacts
Data/Methods: Our analysis uses plant-level Census microdata for pulp and paper mills during the 1967-2012 period. We focus on firms which own plants at any point in four or more states, to avoid firms that might have less opportunity to shift production across states. We model the firms’ production shares in each state with a conditional logit specification, testing several measures of state regulatory stringency, including county non-attainment status, and controlling for other state characteristics that might affect production costs and production location. The conditional logit approach enables us to measure within-firm allocation of production across plants. We test for heterogeneity across firms in how much they respond to regulatory stringency. We also examine overall firm-level production and relate this to the regulatory stringency faced by the firm, to see whether production cuts in stricter states are offset (partially or completely) by gains in less strict states.
Expected Results: Our results will provide information about the impact of regulatory stringency on firm-level production allocation. We anticipate that firms will tend to shift production away from states with more stringent environmental regulations, but rather than simply focusing on the gross impacts – differences between high- and low-stringency states – we will also consider the net impacts on overall production levels, which might well be smaller than the gross impacts.