Intellectual property rights and US offshoring behavior
We construct US offshoring data for 23 industries by using bilateral import trade data and input-output tables. For IPR protection we use an index for 121 countries constructed by Walter Park. The time span of our data set, 2002-2012, is constrained by the availability of the bilateral trade data. We perform regression analysis to examine the relationship between our four measures of US offshoring and IPR protection. In our regressions, we include industry, country and year fixed effects, along with other control variables.
In our first set of specifications, we treat all industries as being equally responsive to IPR changes. We find that all offshoring measures increase with increased IPR protection with the exception of related-party offshoring. However, the results are not robust to including country-specific time trends
In our second set of specifications, we classify industries as high-tech (patent sensitive) and low-tech (patent insensitive). We find that in high-tech industries, all offshoring measures respond positively to increased IPR protection. These results are robust to including country-specific time trends. In low-tech industries, however, only third-party broad offshoring and third party intra-industry offshoring respond positively to IPR reform. Moreover, these results are not robust to including country-specific time trends.
In our third set of specifications, we regress the ratio of related-party offshoring to total offshoring for both broad and intra industry offshoring measures. Our objective is to test whether the mode of offshoring has shifted towards related-party or third party following IPR changes. We find that there was no significant change in the ratio of related-party to total offshoring. These insignificant results hold for both broad and intra-industry measures and also for both low-tech and high-tech industries.