In this research we analysed the major differences between local accounting legislature (known as de jure harmonisation) and practices (known as de facto harmonisation) with the international accounting referential being represented by IFRS. The reason for comparability with IFRS is the request for listed companies to prepare their consolidated financial statements based on IFRS framework.
Methodology applied for de jure harmonisation was based on application of Jaccard, Roger-Tanimoto and Spearman’s coefficients. The results show high comparability between Slovak accounting legislature and IFRS. De facto harmonisation analysis was based on interviews done with representatives of accounting professions in the respective countries – standard setters, auditors, accountants and academicians. A major output from the interviews is their perceptions of the costs and benefits of possible implementation of IFRS and the application of the implementation strategy. Representatives see one of the weaknesses of V4 accounting as the strong linkage between legislature and taxation and, from this point of view, one can see the possible shift towards IFRS as a significant burden for companies.