Moreover, this study finds a non-linear relationship between ownership concentration and over-investment. An important implication of this research is that controlling shareholders may play either an expropriation or monitoring role. In line with the agency theory, concentrated ownership enables controlling shareholders to pursue their self-interests through over-investment. However, when ownership concentration is beyond an optimum level, controlling shareholders have less incentive to carry out sub-optimal investment decisions. Furthermore, we find that abnormal investment is related to financial risk in a U-shaped direction, indicating that both under-investment and over-investment cause higher financial risk. Our findings corroborate the need to account for non-linearity when investigating the influence of investment expenditures on financial risk. Overall, the present study fills the gap of determining the factors and consequences of over-investment by highlighting the role of family control and the problem of higher risk after over-investment. Various robustness checks, including alternative regression estimation models and different proxies, have been conducted to address the endogeneity problem using 2SLS and Fama–MacBeth regressions and the non-linearity issue of ownership-decision association.