88th International Atlantic Economic Conference
October 17 - 20, 2019 | Miami, USA

A comparative study of bitcoin prices and financial asset classes

Saturday, 19 October 2019: 4:50 PM
Pierre Rafih, M.B.A. , Faculty for Business Administration, University of Applied Management, Ismaning, Germany
Florian Bartholomae, Ph.D. , Munich Business School, Munich, Germany
After nearly 11 years, Bitcoin is still around and while its future is uncertain, at a value of over 5,000 USD, unsecured by any asset or institution, it remains a remarkable phenomenon in the financial world in the digital age of transparency and readily available information. In a previous paper the authors looked at behavioral models and psychological constructs to try and determine factors that drove individuals’ attitudes, intentions and decisions to invest or not in the first global cryptocurrency.

Since such behavioral elements cannot fully explain the development of Bitcoin, which was most likely largely driven a range of factors, the purpose of this paper is to widen the analysis by taking a macroeconomic, financial and political perspective. As much as commodities, stocks and currency exchange rates are driven by a variety of factors, the paper tries to determine whether the same and/or other factors influence the development of Bitcoin, which can be considered as a speculative unregulated asset.

The paper centers on an empirical study that aims to investigate three dependent variables: Bitcoin prices, trading volume and media buzz. The study uses a range of independent variables from macroeconomics, finance and politics. Data for independent variables are gathered from scientific resources and international public organizations including the European Central Bank (ECB), EUROSTAT, the ifo-institute, International Monetary Fund (IMF) and possibly the World Bank, while Bitcoin prices, trading volumes and media buzz are mainly drawn from publicly accessible internet resources.

Expected results include determining which of the dependent variables, if any, show significant levels of correlation with the dependent variables. Depending on the results, it may be possible to clearly determine the nature of Bitcoin. Expected policy implications would rather relate to financial regulation than monetary policy.