Hein Roelfsema, Ph.D., Yi Zhang, MSc, and Martijn Boermans, MSc. International Economics, Utrecht School of Economics, Utrecht University, Janskerkhof 12, Utrecht, 3512 BL, Netherlands
We empirically investigate the factors that drive the uneven regional distribution of foreign direct investment (FDI) inflows to China’s 31 provinces from 1995 to 2006. The aim of this paper is to explain the investment patterns in (partly) foreign funded firms across these provinces. Non-standard is that we use factor analysis to derive four hypotheses that may drive FDI: institutions, labour costs, market potential, and geography. The factor analysis then structures our dataset to concentrate on four clusters consisting 40 province specific and time-varying items. The main gain of the factor analysis not only helps us to identify the latent dimensions which are not apparent from direct study, but also facilitates econometrics with reduced number of variables. To test the four hypotheses, we apply a fixed effects panel estimation and GMM to account for endogeneity. In line with theoretical predictions we find that foreign investors choose and invest more in provinces with better institutions, lower labor costs, and larger market size. Nonlinear results denote that the positive effects of institutions such as infrastructure and market potential on FDI are complementary to each other, which is in line with the economic geography literature. In particular the effect of market size on FDI is larger in provinces with better institutions. Moreover, in the absence of good institutions such as governance, the change in labor costs has no impact on FDI, which is well in line with the imperfect contracting approach foreign investment. Sub-sample study confirms the existences of a large disparity between East and West. In the poorer large western provinces FDI is strongly driven by the geographical factor in contrast to the east of China where institutions play a significant role to build the ‘factory of the world’. Robustness tests indicate that two sub-dimensions of institutions, namely infrastructure and governance, are important to determine the locational choice of FDI in China.